Web 2.0 platforms that many of us use in our personal life, such as facebook or pinterest or tripadvisor, have been adopted without too much thought for the time we’ve each invested to setup our profile and start using the application. For example, I started using tripadvisor without any training or setup cost, and continue to use the platform to achieve my objective of a well-planned, enjoyable holiday.While many executives and employees have realised the benefits of web 2.0 adoption in our personal lives, we can see that there is little cost involved and so the benefit derived does not need to be quantified or justified. As discussed previously on this blog, the nature of enterprise 2.0 platforms is emergent outcomes, that is, valuable outcomes that cannot be predicted in advance. This is a challenge within enterprises that need to identify and quantify the beneficial outcomes in order to justify the initial investment in adopting new work practices and new applications.
Perhaps what makes enterprise 2.0 a different proposition to our personal use, is that it’s a significantly larger investment for an organisation to implement an application.
The cost of implementation can include:
- infrastructure and software costs if it’s hosted internally to address risks such as security and privacy, or
- licensing costs when it’s a software as a service application
- organisational change program to drive better work practices
Like Cinderella finding the shoe that fits perfectly, many organisations have invested in an enterprise 2.0 platform that meets theirneeds. These are organisations that have made the decision to implement and have seen the benefits achieved commensurate with the investment. Let’s take a look at how some companies have identified and quantified the return on their initial investment.
Austin Hardware, a manufacturing and distribution company have reduced total effort across their product development lifecycle through earlier feedback on potential profitability of their projects using a project collaboration tool.
Getty Images adopted collaboration platform SocialText with the target of improving new employee onboarding. SocialText have quantified the return for effective onboarding as reduced time to effectiveness by 50%.
SBAB, a government owned bank in Sweden, set out to create “their Wikipedia” where everyone can publish but also everyone can search and find. Their representative is quoted saying “We have increased our efficiency with at least 10% over these five months”
SMG, an American consulting firm implemented corproate microblogging tool Yammer. They attribute time savings through decreased miscommunication and reduced duplication as well as improved response times to customers.
Burberry’s end-to-end Enterprise 2.0 adoption – from their CRM system, to the internal collaboration tool, to their online presence – was credited with contributing to a 21% profit increase in 4th quarter 2011.
These are case studies from diverse industries adopting very different collaboration tools that prove that it is possible to quantify the return on investment for enteprise 2.0 adoption.
We know the ugly step sisters tried to cram their feet into a shoe that was never going to fit, the path to enterprise 2.0 success is littered with companies that have would like to achieve the benefits promised and yet have chosen an approach and a scale that haven’t been a good fit with the organisations capabilities and needs. Each of these case studies illustrates the many different approaches that can be taken, illustrating there is no one-size-fits-all answer the challenges of justifying the investment being made: some organisation have seen adoption spread organically through their employees resulting in successful outcomes, where as others have taken a structured approach to ensure the rollout is a success.
The different collaboration tools each have different costing models that may allow an organisation to match the benefit to the costs as few employees using the tool means low costs which then rise with increased usage and correspondingly increased benefits; other tools have a significant upfront cost with the return on investment increasing with increased usage, or the ability to drive greater benefits through integration with existing IT investments.
There are a multitude of case studies showing the return on investment of using social media and web 2.0 platforms for engaging from the business to customers or potential employees. What’s interesting is that all of the case studies above, with the exception of Burberry, have adopted enterprise 2.0 tools for specific internal benefits that match their organisation strategy.
What do you think, is there a bigger challenging quantifying the return on investment for internally looking implementations?